Talk:Harley Benton

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Musical Instruments Mid‑importance

	Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Musical Instruments, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of musical instruments on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Musical InstrumentsWikipedia:WikiProject Musical InstrumentsTemplate:WikiProject Musical Instrumentsmusical instruments articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Notability?[edit]

Harley Benton is just a label name with no history nor distinctive qualities other than being the regular low-cost China-made instruments. Does it really deserve to be on the Wikipedia ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Korgogro (talk • contribs) 13:25, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Korgogro!

Please follow talk-page guidelines and avoid soapboxing. Our personal opinions are usually best kept to ourselves, and we should focus on what reliable sources say. The article does have references, and I removed statements that appeared to be non-factual. I don't have the time to improve the article.

There is at least one apparently reliable source discussing Thomann and HB, so there is no reason to consider deleting this article on Thomann and HB.

I also asked for opinions about the reliability of The Music News, which is a trade journal, but received no response.

Cheers, Kiefer.Wolfowitz 14:38, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's a corporate adsheet. I've tagged it as such.
Weeb Dingle (talk) 04:35, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Weblinks in the article[edit]

I don't know how it is in the English Wikipedia, but in the German weblinks in the flow text aren't welcome? I suggest it is the same here and so the Weblinks, maybe they should be the source, aren't suitable. --Jönd (talk) 16:58, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]