Talk:Hari's on Tour (Express)

Hari's on Tour (Express) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 21, 2013	Good article nominee	Listed

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

The Beatles Low‑importance

This George Harrison-related article is within the scope of WikiProject The Beatles, which focuses on improving coverage of English rock band The Beatles and related topics on Wikipedia. Users who are willing to participate in the project should visit the project page, where they can join and see a list of open tasks.The BeatlesWikipedia:WikiProject The BeatlesTemplate:WikiProject The BeatlesThe Beatles articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to songs on Wikipedia.

To-do list:

For WikiProject The Beatles

A list of articles needing cleanup associated with this project is available. See also the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Articles on each Beatle tour (Category:The Beatles concert tours). See: Missing articles.
Expand : The Lost Lennon Tapes, notable radio series which has spawned many bootlegs. Apple Records See also: Adopt an article
Stubs : See: Category:The Beatles song stubs
Update : Pics/Graphics wanted: Kenwood.
Verify : Beatle wives
Other : Project: Add {{WikiProject The Beatles}} to the talk pages of all Beatles-related articles. Send a newsletter to members, canvas for new members and coordinate tasks. Enter articles assessed as stubs onto this list, also list articles needing cleanup and other work here.

This article does not yet have a related to do list. If you can think of any ways to improve the article, why not create one?

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hari's on Tour (Express)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Paul MacDermott (talk · contribs) 20:49, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to take this on, I'll read through it and do a review in the next few days. Paul MacDermott (talk) 20:49, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My first impression of this is good. Well written and sourced, and interesting. I'll do another pass through it a bit later on and go through the checklist, but it seems fine. Paul MacDermott (talk) 14:23, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Checklist criteria

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	~~I reviewed this through text to speech so just need someone to check the punctuation for me.~~ Checked (yeepsi)
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	No images here so not applicable
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	N/A
	7. Overall assessment.	Seems ok, but I'll pop it on hold until the punctuation's been checked. Once that's done I'll pass this. :ok, everything good now so I'll update the talk page.

2nd opinion

I'll look over it within the next hour. Best, yeepsi (Talk tonight) 09:49, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Prose has been checked. Best, yeepsi (Talk tonight) 10:15, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Grand, thanks for that. I can update this now. Congrats again JG on another good article. Paul MacDermott (talk) 12:25, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, that's great. Thanks as always for your time, Paul MacD – and to you Yeepsi (for making this quick and painless ;) ... I might end up adding a pic after all – the tour programme cover, because it seems relevant on a couple of fronts – but I'll let you both know if I do. Big thanks again! JG66 (talk) 14:59, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

1974 Joni Mitchell.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:22, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]