Talk:Hanns Martin Schleyer Foundation

COMMENTS BELOW ARE A C&P FROM THE OLD HANNS MARTIN SCHLEYER PRIZE article (BLAR'd)

Why should there be a WP article about this Prize?[edit]

This article appears to be promotional content. Can an editor state the significance and notability of this award, beyond the promotion of its corporate sponsor? Please provide secondary Reliable Sources for the text of the article. SPECIFICO talk 18:46, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think WP:POTENTIAL applies. – S. Rich (talk) 01:53, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

List of awardees[edit]

I think including a list of the awardees is helpful. It can be expanded upon by specifying the criteria which the award committee relied upon and what the awardees talked about in their acceptance speeches. – S. Rich (talk) 19:44, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

First things first. This looks like no more than corporate PR to me. I made sure to check that the winners were listed on the prize website and added a link for those readers who need to research their names. Let's find some reliable sources that discuss this prize. Otherwise I think it's going the way of the dodo bird. Just because Daimler is able to get the cooperation of, or avoid being snubbed by various individuals does not make this award notable. Actually I think the Pillsbury Bakeoff may be more notable. SPECIFICO talk 20:15, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Now tagged refimprove. Admittedly (previously) promotional with the adjectives, but pruning such language is the way to go. – S. Rich (talk) 20:22, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I would very much like to see some secondary sources that discuss the prize and its significance. That would be helpful. We need more eyes on this page. SPECIFICO talk 20:46, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal[edit]

I propose that this article be merged into Hanns Martin Schleyer Foundation. Each topic could and would receive better coverage. A WP:BLAR would accomplish the merger nicely. If the section for the prize becomes mores substantial (at a later time) it can be recreated as a new article. – S. Rich (talk) 21:56, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea. Make it so, and meanwhile let's get that gratuitous list out of the article space and restore the link to the Foundation web page. SPECIFICO talk 22:05, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I shall, but first I'll wait for our Deutsche Freund to chime in. – S. Rich (talk) 22:13, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure that's necessary. Policy supports you and he can have his say at any time after the merge if he has policy-driven dissent. Thanks. SPECIFICO talk 22:15, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hanns Martin Schleyer Foundation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150715225450/http://www.schleyer-stiftung.de/preise/hms_preis/preise_schleyer_e.html to http://www.schleyer-stiftung.de/preise/hms_preis/preise_schleyer_e.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:53, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]