Talk:Hamer v. Sidway

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

Just a few points as Scienter put this article up for peer review.

More links or more accuracy can be added. (Consideration is better as 'consideration under american law|consideration'). More blue...
The 'influence of the case' could be extended to judicial effects. High-profile or important cases that follow this case or affirmation in a higher court.
You could add an also see section. for Contract or even add the ContractLaw box
The article doesn't mention any preliminary courts. The way it reads is that the case went straight to the court of appeals. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.166.47.201 (talk) 06:02, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The facts and law is good :-) The Law project seems especially reluctant to assess - in FA, A and GA there are only 8 articles ALTOGETHER !! Bamkin 15:13, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]