Talk:Hadlyme Ferry Historic District

Connecticut Low‑importance

	Connecticut portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph of some of the houses in the district be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in Connecticut may be able to help!

The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

significance[edit]

The NRIS database, via the Elkman interface, states the significance of the HD is architectural:

Historic function: transportation; domestic
Historic subfunction: water-related; secondary structure; single dwelling
Building is listed for architectural criteria

An editor has twice removed my statement in the article that the significance is architectural (once removing altogether with suggestion of doubt of my accuracy, once asserting dual importance of transportation and architecture). I reverted twice, because the source I have access to is clear that the significance is architectural. Please discuss here. doncram (talk) 04:41, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Another interface, the one I believe I cited, is NRHP.COM, where I believe I had picked up on the "Historic significance" being "Architecture/Engineering, Event". The NRHP.COM listing is:

Historic Significance: 	Architecture/Engineering, Event
Architectural Style: 	Federal, Colonial
Area of Significance: 	Transportation, Architecture
Period of Significance: 	1750-1799, 1800-1824, 1825-1849, 1850-1874, 1875-1899, 1900-1924, 1925-1949
Owner: 	Private , State
Historic Function: 	Domestic, Transportation
Historic Sub-function: 	Secondary Structure, Single Dwelling, Water-Related
Current Function: 	Domestic, Transportation
Current Sub-function: 	Secondary Structure, Single Dwelling, Water-Related

doncram (talk) 04:46, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm...I think I would have interpreted "Area of Significance: Transportation, Architecture" as supporting dual importance of transportation and architecture. You think that only what's under Historic Significance should be included? Lvklock (talk) 04:54, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, okay, if someone else wants to make an according change to the article go ahead. doncram (talk) 05:15, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]