Talk:HMS Resistance (1861)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Resistance (1861)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 10:01, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Criteria[edit]

  • It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    • A few duplicate links: muzzle velocity, bulkhead, wrought iron
  • It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    • No citation errors noted.
  • It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  • It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
  • It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  • It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
    a (tagged and captioned): b (Is illustrated with appropriate images): c (non-free images have fair use rationales): d public domain pictures appropriately demonstrate why they are public domain:
    • Appropriate tags used for images.
  • Overall:
    a Pass/Fail:

Only issue noted is with duplicate links. Otherwise, all good. Zawed (talk) 10:01, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

All fixed. Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 13:54, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Passed as GA. Zawed (talk) 10:59, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]