Talk:HMS Grenville (H03)/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Bernstein2291 ^{(Talk • Contributions • Sign Here)} 20:48, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
Can you find any more sources about this ship?
Sure, but they don't have as much detail as the ones used.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 12:50, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
So you would get no new information by using those other sources? Bernstein2291 ^{(Talk • Contributions • Sign Here)} 17:06, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Exactly. She had such a short life that there's not much coverage on her, unlike her sisters.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:06, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Are there any photos or diagram of the ship?
Not for her, but I added one for her sister.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 12:50, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not even a diagram? Bernstein2291 ^{(Talk • Contributions • Sign Here)} 17:06, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing that's not copyrighted.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:06, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

I've added another source.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:47, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've asked for a second opinion. While on paper it should pass, my gut is telling me different. Bernstein2291 ^{(Talk • Contributions • Sign Here)} 05:25, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to pass it. Bernstein2291 ^{(Talk • Contributions • Sign Here)} 02:19, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]