Talk:HD 188753

Expansion

This page has a request for expansion listed on it, but there is no discussion either here or on the Wikipedia:Requests for expansion page. Anyone know what's needed? Or should we delete the request? --zandperl 18:50, 17 August 2005 (UTC)

It's been there since the early days of this article. I don't think it's needed anymore. --Der Sporkmeister 19:37, 17 August 2005 (UTC)

Removed. --zandperl 21:11, 17 August 2005 (UTC)

trinary star planetary system

In the introductory paragraph: This star system is only the second triple-star system known to have a planet orbiting it, and later on: In 2005 the discovery of HD 188753 Ab was the first known planet in a triple star system. So, which is it? Is it the first or the second? Nik42 08:38, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Merger proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result was merge content from HD 188753 Ab. -- Icalanise (talk) 23:15, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

---

The planet HD 188753 Ab is not currently thought to exist: a second team searching for the planet failed to find any evidence of it, and in fact showed that the data in the original discovery paper do not support the proposed planetary candidate [1]. Having an entire article about the planet thus gives entirely too much attention to a nonexistent object. It is long past the time Maciej Konacki said he planned to have issued an update [2], and in any case the wording of his response to the Eggenberger et al. paper indicates that whatever solution he was investigating was an alternative to the original solution, NOT a confirmation of the original one. 86.171.72.213 (talk) 11:17, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

• Agree with the merger proposal. Reyk _YO! 09:28, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

minor cleanup

There were a few weasel words in the style of presentation. i hope it's a bit better now.

The reference for looking for updates is http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-ref_query?bibcode=2007A%26A...466.1179E&refs=CITATIONS&db_key=AST which is the list of articles that cite Eggenberger's paper. When Konacki publishes an update, he is certain to cite the Eggenberger paper, so this seems to be a good place to look for updates. The as of template claims that logged-in users should see the link, but for me it's a style="display:none" link. Boud (talk) 08:27, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Lack of information/Citations for HD 188753 B and HD 188753 C.

HD 188753 B and HD 188753 C are rarely (if at all ) mentioned outside of the starbox. The citations used for the mass estimates fail to mention HD 188753 B and HD 188753 C completely, nevermind mass. From what it seems the system is a G8V+G??+K?? system (Two G-types and one K-type). More citations for Objects B/C are needed. Davidbuddy9 (talk) 21:46, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on HD 188753. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091027015503/http://media.caltech.edu/press_releases/12716 to http://media.caltech.edu/press_releases/12716

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:12, 27 October 2017 (UTC)