Talk:Guild Inn

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Untitled[edit]

http://72.14.205.104/search?q=cache:kDPfuGYzXwoJ:www.torontoartscape.on.ca/mydocs/media/pdf/the_loop_fw_2006_download120606_145131.pdf+artscape+guild+inn&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=2&client=opera

has a paragraph ref to artscape's work on this property

Clarification[edit]

Please note, the following phrase gives a mistaken impression that was not part of the Toronto Star article cited. "A volunteer group, Friends of Guild Park and Gardens, was formed in 2013 to try to rescue the park and restore the inn.[8]"

Note: To clarify, the newly-formed Friends of Guild Park and Gardens is focused on "revitalizing" or "reviving" the 88-acre park by attracting more people and attention to the site. The Friends group is not focused on "restoring the inn" . The fate of the original building that served as the Guild Inn is entirely up to the City of Toronto. Given the changing community demographics, the change in Toronto's hotel industry and the deterioration of the building itself, it is extremely unlikely that an inn or hotel operation will be revived on the Guild grounds. Restoring the original building is also unclear. A 2005 City of Toronto report recommended the structure be demolished

Citation: http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/2005/agendas/committees/sc/sc050531/it004.pdf "...staff hoped that the original Bickford Residence could be retained and restored as part of the redevelopment of the site. After review of the architect’s findings and an inspection of the existing structure, staff is unable to recommend that the Bickford Residence be restored due to the deteriorated condition of the structure. Any approach to restoration or renovation would require a degree of intervention that, in the end, would leave so little of the original as to make the project essentially a replica with some internal original framing."

More recently, a structural Engineering Assessment (dated Sept. 14, 2011) of the Bickford Residence done by Rochon Engineering stated: "The structural components of the building are structurally sound and the building is in suitable condition to for [sic] architectural and interior retrofit."

It's important that the City of Toronto make a decision about the future of the building and the future use of the site. Meanwhile the citizens involved in the new Friends of the Guild Park & Gardens will be focused on attracting more people and attention to the park itself.

Hope this provides a useful perspective Submitted by John Mason, on behalf of Friends of the Guild Park & Gardens Apr 18/2013

Citation: https://wx.toronto.ca/inter/pmmd/calls.nsf/0/6A7CC43F2C4DCD5D85257B1A0072505A/$file/0613-13-0067%20Addendum%203.pdf — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jon vs (talkcontribs) 17:28, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Guild Inn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:08, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]