Talk:Grange Abbey

Ireland Low‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archaeology

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Candidate for B class[edit]

Especially if someone had a drawing, and / or another photo, or one more reference. Will check, and return for formal assessment within the near weeks. SeoR (talk) 21:17, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Raphael Hoey, the last farmer of the area, died 1977, and at that time the address of Grange House was still Grange Abbey, Raheny (odd given that the lands were taken from Baldoyle, but it also appears in accounts of Charlie Haughey's development projects in the future Donaghmede area). It us about the Hoeys and the last years of Grange House that a further reference would be useful. More data on the Mayne can be found in articles such as https://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/archive/1993/0623/Pg003.html, which explain why parts of its systems were culverted. Aside from the Hoey farm, the other reference-seeking point is about the AnCo works. SeoR (talk) 21:22, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

B-class review[edit]

Has a defined structure, including a lead section, and one or more sections of body content - yes
Is free from major grammatical and spelling errors - yes
Reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious inaccuracies or omissions - yes (there does not seem to be much more information extant, subject to including more from the modern archaeological works)
Is suitably referenced, and all major points have appropriate inline citations - yes
Contains, as and when appropriate, supporting materials, such as an infobox, images / figures / tables - image, map, infobox - sufficient at this scale

(but respecting USEPROSE - yes). PASS. SeoR (talk) 21:50, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]