Talk:Gran Atlas Aguilar

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Maps Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maps, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Maps and Cartography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MapsWikipedia:WikiProject MapsTemplate:WikiProject MapsMaps articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.
	This article had an importance automatically assigned to it. Once it has been checked by a human, please remove `\|autoi=yes`.

Books

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

Ashibaka wrote: "don't see the anon's problem, this is only reworded and makes no "bibliographic" changes".
Well, Mr. or Mrs. Ashibaka:
- Gran Atlas Aguilar is NOT a seventh edition of an earlier work since it is completely new.
- Atlas Universal Aguilar had NO 166 pages of maps, but – as I wrote, 116.
- Who says it was "the most elaborative" atlas of its kind after WW II?
It's not reworded, but a wrong translation. In bibliography it's those little things, you know.