Talk:Grady McWhiney

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Weak article[edit]

This is a weak bio because it seems to reflect bias against McWhiney with unreferenced negative assertions about his work. I'm only going to attempt to improve the format for now and leave the referencing to others, but may tone down or eliminate the most gratuitous ones. If this strikes anyone as "weasel wording" it will be an attempt at bettering what is there, at least. Rlquall 19:00, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

agree weak - for ignores his racism as his fellow country club attendees could attest about his words n private - as if they would disclose — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.174.191.14 (talk) 16:31, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The beginning paragraph sounds like an ad campaign[edit]

"These are words easily applied to one of the South's most prominent scholars, Grady McWhiney. For over three decades his writings have been discussed and debated but never disregarded." —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Vanguard587 (talkcontribs) 23:09, 26 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

I moved the quotation to the end in order to reduce that problem. -Will Beback · · 00:36, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think this guy is not aware that many Southerns were from England, Germany, and Jewish as well. (Parkers, Bedsoles, the battle flag is the Jewish Saltire cross, and not the St. Andrews cross. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.33.202.236 (talk) 00:43, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah also the largest pre-revolution group to populate the American south was in fact English indentured servants, not Celts of any variety. That's why his work is considered psuedo-history by the overwhelming majority of legitimate academia. Thesouthernhistorian45 (talk) 06:27, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Grady McWhiney. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:25, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Celtic Thesis[edit]

McWhiney did not originate the Celtic Thesis; it is one of several theses in W. J. Cash: The Mind of the South (1941), and Cash does not claim to be original. (He is using it to debunk the Cavalier Thesis, then popular.) I have no real doubt it was one of the bases of "One Southron can beat ten Yankees", vintage 1861. I have less doubt that McWhiney was not publishing when he was 13. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 17:48, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]