Talk:Governor General's Foot Guards

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Just a correction, the "Second World War–era German MG42" is not actually an MG42. During a visit in the Museum I was corrected and told that it was in fact, not an MG42. I will not change the article until I actually go back to the Museum and read the panel again myself. 74.56.236.154 03:44, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is the 1927 photo really one of the GGFG?[edit]

Though it looks like they are standing in front of Parliament the cuff frogging is different from a Guards regiment and there is no red plume. Is it possible it is of the 10th Royal Grenadiers or the Vandoos?Foofbun (talk) 07:41, 1 February 2011 (UTC) http://canadaatwar.tripod.com/55pics/30.jpg[reply]

Good point: most of the soldiers are wearing line-infantry tunics, which combined with the bearskins make them look like fusiliers or R22eR (which wears fusilier uniforms because of the alliance with the Welch Fusiliers). However, fusiliers wear a cap badge on their bearskins, and there aren't any cap badges in the picture. And also, the colour party and the officer next to His Excellency are wearing guards tunics with buttons in twos -- only GGFG has worn this tunic in Canada. So maybe there was a shortage of guards tunics and the were making do with line-infantry tunics? Or maybe this is a composite formation? Indefatigable (talk) 17:27, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Governor General's Foot Guards. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:18, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]