Talk:Gloria Ana Chevesich

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 01:21, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Created/expanded by Nick Number (talk). Self-nominated at 04:34, 30 September 2019 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: No - Going by Google Translate, the La Nación and El Mercurio sources do not appear to expressly mention that she is best known for the MOP-Gate case. Let me know if this is wrong.
  • Interesting: Yes
QPQ: None required.

Overall: I'd suggest a shorter hook which would comply with the requirements, because I don't think there is a need to emphasize in a hook that someone is best known for a particular case. ALT1: ... that before joining the Supreme Court of Chile, Gloria Ana Chevesich convicted a former government minister and 13 others of fraud in the MOP-Gate case? feminist (talk) 03:16, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This seems like a very thin point, as just about all of the other cites mention her in conjunction with that case, and the Radio Cooperativa one refers to her as "the judge from the MOP-Gate case" in the headline. But ok, I have no objection to removing the "best known for" wording. Nick Number (talk) 15:29, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Right, this sounds reasonable. Approving the original hook. feminist (talk) 17:51, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]