Talk:Global Counterterrorism Forum

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Terrorism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Terrorism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles on terrorism, individual terrorists, incidents and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TerrorismWikipedia:WikiProject TerrorismTemplate:WikiProject TerrorismTerrorism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Article has multiple issues[edit]

This article has multiple issues. I have updated the clean-up tags, accordingly. However, I think some additional explanation is needed. For an article to be notable it generally needs to have significant coverage in secondary and tertiary sources that are reliable and independent of the subject. An organization's official website is usually insufficient to demonstrate notability because it is a primary source. The best way to demonstrate notability is to provide inline citations for each fact or piece of information in the article. I also flagged that the lead section has extra information that is not in the body of the article. A common issue with writing Wikipedia articles is that editors include information in the first few sentences of the article that are never mentioned or explained in more detail later in the article. The purpose of the lead is to provide a summary overview of the article. If you search for a topic, you will often find the opening paragraph or even just the first sentence returned in search engine results. A well worded lead quickly allows readers to quickly determine if an article is relevant. Unlike news stories, Wikipedia article leads are not written like newspaper ledes. Unlike news stories, Wikipedia article leads summarize their articles, they do not tease readers by only providing a tidbit of information to make them read more. That means the information in the lead will need to be repeated later in the article. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 01:38, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]