Talk:Glasgow and South Western Railway

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

I am still working on the full historical notes of this railway: I'm away for a week now, but will try to do a more complete job on my return. All of these pre-grouping railways deserve a lengthy explanation of their antecedents, to show where they came from, in my opinion. Peter Shearan 19:21, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How's that work going?
By the way I cant' find much to back up the proposed Hunterston railway material; both the links on the page are broken. Afterbrunel (talk) 10:39, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Shipping section[edit]

At present this article has a lengthy Passenger ships section.

I think it could well be expanded and I think it deserves an article of its own. If no-one objects I'll do that, and reduce the text in this main article to just a summary.

The new article ought to have a lot of information about routes (and mayeb a bit about boat trains); and also freight boats. Afterbrunel (talk) 17:41, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Afterbrunel (talk) 10:16, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
For the avoidance of misunderstanding, I have exported the Shipping material to a new page; I think much more needs to be written about the topic -- at the moment it is simply a list of vessels. Nonetheless it was in danger of demanding a disproportionate amount of space in the main article, which still needs substantial enhancement. I have incorporated a basic reference to the "daughter article" in this G&SWR article; that too needs to be expanded a little. Afterbrunel (talk) 10:39, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough, but there nneds to be a link from this article to the shipping article. Mjroots (talk) 13:09, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the link I put in the article was

(main heading)Shipping

Serving many piers and harbours on the Firth of Clyde it was natural that the G&SWR developed G&SWR shipping services to the islands and other piers. This traffic increased considerably in the 1870s and excursion traffic also became significant.

Why not expand that a little, or better still expand the shipping article. It needs a lot of work (most of which is outside my area of knowledge); routes; growth over time; development of trippers; development of the businessmen who weekended on the islands and travelled to their places of business on Monday morning; independent competition; piers; LMS attitude; post war decline. Afterbrunel (talk) 07:59, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Glasgow and South Western Railway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:21, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Glasgow and South Western Railway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:44, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Glasgow_and_South_Western_Railway&oldid=1217225189"