This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
I am concerned that this article violates WP:N as the article references consist solely of ship lists, such as Lloyd's, Die deutschen Kriegsschiffe, and Miramar. While these articles are not an issue in itself as they contain useful data, they only mention the Hinrich Wilhelms alongside every other ship of the same type. This is fine for notable warships, however many of the Vorpostenboot lack articles and notability. It is also likely a Kriegsfischkutter, which has little English on the topic. Sources should discuss the boat for more than a few lines to justify an article.
The sources provide a decent amount of information, however it mainly relates to the bookkeeping side of the vessel, such as identification letters and name changes. This information is incredibly common, and does not justify an article in itself.
