Talk:Gerald Ratner Athletics Center/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: –– Jezhotwells (talk) 14:59, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: fixed one dab.[1] –– Jezhotwells (talk) 15:03, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Linkrot: no dead links, fixed one access date.[2] –– Jezhotwells (talk) 15:06, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   I made some minor copyedits for style.[3]

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   References all check out and are reliable sources.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Thorough and not overdetailed

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Correctly licensed and tagged

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   I have no hesitation in passing this as a good artcile. Congratulations. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 15:20, 11 July 2010 (UTC)