Talk:George K. Simon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Nomination for deletion[edit]

Hello, I would like to resolve the problems with this article. I will remove the two claims. Are there any other issues I can address? Thank you for your help. Bclorenz21 (talk) 20:53, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I was unaware removing the cleanup tags was a problem. I apologize. This is literally the first thing I have edited. Thanks again Bclorenz21 (talk) 20:57, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bclorenz21. Thanks for your interest in improving this Wikipedia article! Right now this article is being considered for deletion because the notability of its subject has not been established by reliable sources. It would help if you could indicate why George K. Simon is a "notable" figure according to our policies, and then find some reliable sources which support these claims. —Psychonaut (talk) 09:24, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism Absent[edit]

I believe that this article should discuss Simon's views in the context of competing and supporting evidence. 98.171.161.54 (talk) 06:12, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on George K. Simon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:26, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extensively edited by the subject or by someone connected to the subject[edit]

The vast majority of the edits on this article appear to be someone connected to the subject and many of the 12 references and 7 links are dead or poor quality (example). The discussion of the books is in the style of press releases from a publisher (e.g., The book also offers tips |attempts to provide an in-depth, but readily understandable explanation | Simon asserts further that these can neither be adequately understood ). I know this biography is personally important. I encourage you to discuss the changes and additions here and let impartial editors help. I think that will help make this a better article. Wiki-psyc (talk) 00:19, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]