Talk:Geobiology (pseudoscience)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Geobiology (pseudoscience) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Skepticism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Title[edit]

The title is ridiculous ; if geobiology is a << field of scientific research >>, how is it a pseudoscience ? Regards Michel421 (talk) 17:47, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. This article offers no evidence that the dowsing/radiesthesia/electromagnetic hypersensitivity aspect of geobiology is a distinct field of study, and not just bad/pseudo scientists imagining they are doing good geobiology. Setting up a "straw man" article solely for the purpose of shooting down the topic is not encyclopedic. I'd suggest that it be broken up and merged back into those various articles and then deleted. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 07:53, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]