Talk:Generation Yes

Ireland Low‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics: Political parties Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled[edit]

What is this?!! Sarah777 (talk) 01:22, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ADVERT and related issues[edit]

This article has several problems. Firstly, it is very much WP:ADVERT in tone (and the repeat inclusion of the group's facebook/twitter links would seem to be for promotional reasons only). Secondly, in its current form it doesn't seem to meet WP:CORP for groups/organisations, as there is only one secondary source provided and it doesn't seem to have been the subject of "significant coverage" beyond this. (Several national news agencies picked up the launch press release, but this is not "significant coverage"). And finally, there are WP:CRYSTAL issues also in tone. Stating as it does that the group "will be campaigning" in emphatic terms. When this campaigning hasn't started yet, and no referendum has definitively been set yet. (Though no doubt a referendum will be set, the tone still needs review). Guliolopez (talk) 10:16, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Some of the issues noted above have since been addressed. However, save for the launch PR, there is no "significant coverage" on the subject of this article. It may be that, in time, notability under WP:ORG is confirmed, but - until then - care needs to be taken in relation to the WP:NOTNEWS guidelines. Guliolopez (talk) 20:26, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Grassroots?[edit]

They were set up by IBEC, they're a classic astroturf front group, this article has massive NPOV problems. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.44.85.212 (talk) 01:16, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To be fair, that can be said of the entire Lisbon article and anything linked to it before the elections. Looking at foreign language articles, the English article was fairly sparse upto now. It'd be interesting to look at the edit history... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.71.100.152 (talk) 14:18, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Generation Yes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:41, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]