Talk:G.o.d

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Korea Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Korean popular culture working group.

cleanup?[edit]

This article needs some crazy work. :T But I don't know anything about them other than their "Road" song. :PSKS2K6 07:41, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. I'll rephrase. The history section should NOT be left as is; it should be a main section with things like sentences, proper grammar, etc.... Can someone make a paragraph out of that? I'll do my best to clean up whatever's left over; even if you don't know English, if the facts are there, people will help. I just don't know much about g.o.d. SKS2K6 06:01, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Looks to me like history section is missing years for most of things... Reformatting it will require complete rewrite. Monni 05:53, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. This group is so popular, but the article barely tells you anything of the years before the comeback. All in favor of a rewrite, say "I." (Btw, lets use this picture:https://usercontent1.hubstatic.com/13327578_f520.jpg) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.174.35.70 (talk) 14:56, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You cant use just some random picture from the web, it needs to be released under a free licence which this picture is obviously not. Snowflake91 (talk) 17:55, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalized?[edit]

g.o.d or G.O.D. or G.o.d. ? RJFJR (talk) 13:18, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

g.o.d it seems. In ictu oculi (talk) 05:31, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 7 external links on G.o.d (South Korean band). Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for //www.miak.or.kr/stat/kpop_199905.htm
Attempted to fix sourcing for //www.miak.or.kr/stat/kpop_200004.htm
Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.riak.or.kr/stat/kpop_200104.htm
Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.riak.or.kr/stat/kpop_200203.htm
Attempted to fix sourcing for //www.miak.or.kr/stat/kpop_200302.htm
Attempted to fix sourcing for //www.miak.or.kr/stat/kpop_200503.htm
Attempted to fix sourcing for //www.miak.or.kr/stat/kpop_200601.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:51, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]