Talk:Functional Ensemble of Temperament

Psychology Mid‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

Neuroscience Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Iratrofimov (talk · contribs)

Re: tone - Wikipedia specifically asked us to make it more explanatory[edit]

When this page was initially posted, Wikipedia's administrators contacted us to edit it to make it more readable. So the text was made more explanatory. I believe the tag "tone" should be removed. Iratrofimov (talk) 00:30, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

See the main discussion of the COI tag on the page Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine[edit]

The section 17 of the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine hosts the main discussion on this matter Iratrofimov (talk) 00:30, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

deleting additional info only muds up the matter[edit]

The Languages-versions section was deleted by Ozzie10aaaa at 09:53, 3 October 2019, and Additional-References section was deleted at 15:54, 4 October 2019 by Doc James, right at the middle of the COI discussion. Perhaps, we should restore these sections, to make the matter of "who are the players" more transparent? Other users, similarly to WhatamIdoing, might want to look for this info, and PubMed can't deliver it as it doesn't keep the history of all publications from 30 years ago. Otherwise, the STQ page and derivatives really sound that it is only me who initiated the whole thing Iratrofimov (talk) 00:30, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Those removals happened at the STQ page, rather than this one.

By the way, I'm adding the {{connected contributor}} template to this page. It will let people know that you are an expert in the subject, in case they have questions. WhatamIdoing (talk) 18:12, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]