Talk:Fulford

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Fulford which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 20:31, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 14 May 2019[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved -- JHunterJ (talk) 19:08, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fulford (disambiguation) → Fulford
Fulford → Fulford, North Yorkshire

– Given that we now have an article at Fulford, Staffordshire I think we should re visit this discussion. Although the NY location may be the most likely (especially given the battle) it doesn't seem overwhelming [[1]][[2]]. The village of Fulford in Staffordshire has a population of 650 and the wider parish has 5931 (over double the NY one!) while the NY parish only has 2785 (no data is available for the village). The Staffordshire one is also clearly a distinct settlement while the NY one appears to be an outer suburb of York. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:07, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nomination. With 11 entries listed at the Fulford (disambiguation) page, a place with a population of 2785 would have to submit truly distinguished historical credentials to be granted a primary seat at the table of notability and this village appears to fall short. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 05:02, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support. There isn't a clear primary topic. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 20:57, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.