Talk:Frenulum breve

It hurts

My gf tore mine in sexual activity, she was too rough (god bless her though ) and i had to go to the doctors to get it checked into. It is a very sensitive pain that may feel like an infection, best just to get a doctor take look. A refernece may be appropriate to the pain you may feel65.94.242.243 (talk) 21:29, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Problem with that is it is almost impossible to describe pain in a way that is universal. --Lead holder (talk) 20:56, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Problematic addition

I previously posted the following at User talk:Okotoimako:

This edit is problematic in several ways:

• You added the sentence: "Stretching exercises and steroid creams should be used in the first instance." This is an opinion, ie., a point of view (see WP:NPOV#Explanation of the neutral point of view). Wikipedia should not assert opinions, though may be appropriate to say "so-and-so state that..." Unfortunately, no source is cited, so it also appears to be original research.
• You then continued: "If these are unsuccessful, the condition may be treated with surgery." That's very gracious, but Wikipedia isn't in the business of granting permission for surgery. This kind of editorialising doesn't belong. Again, if you have a source that proposes a specific sequence of treatments, by all means cite it.
• You added the paragraph: "Removal of the frenulum or circumcision whether partially or completely, are not required for this problem alone nor should it be recommended, since the foreskin is the most sensitive part of the penis and cannot be replaced." This paragraph is original research. Per that policy: "To demonstrate that you are not adding OR, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material as presented." Not only does the cited source not recommend that circumcision or frenulum removal should be avoided, it doesn't even mention the topic of the article — frenulum breve! Jakew (talk) 23:21, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

References

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Frenulum breve. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090810053008/http://www.themanitoban.com/features/phimosis-smegma-and-frenulum-breve-oh-my to http://themanitoban.com/features/phimosis-smegma-and-frenulum-breve-oh-my

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:47, 14 December 2017 (UTC)