This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article follows the Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Legal. It uses the Bluebook legal referencing style. This citation style uses standardized abbreviations, such as "N.Y. Times" for The New York Times, and has specific typeface formatting requirements. Please review those standards before making style or formatting changes. Information on this referencing style may be obtained at: Cornell's Basic Legal Citation site.
The text says that the FWA test was dead at the time of the CAFC Bilski decision (October 2008). Afaik the FWA test became less and less influential from the very moment it was established, in the early 1980s. In 1990 the influence was still only minimal, and the moment of abolishment is IMHO definitly not later than the 1998 State Street Bank decision, that adopted the "useful, concrete & tangible" test. Rbakels (talk) 23:06, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
