Talk:Frederick Booth-Tucker

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A freemason?[edit]

 CompletedWhen compiling the Booth-Tucker bibliography I saw that he wrote Freeman of Shanghai] (1922 or 1928). This is not evidence in itself that Booth-Tucker was a freemason. Someone could review the book to verify this. If it's confirmed that he was a freemason then we can add him to the List of Freemasons article. The OCLC records are:

  • 11072293 (1928?): St. Paul, MN; Chicago, IL; Evanston, IL; Atlanta, GA; Winston-Salem, NC; New Haven, CT
  • 250359440 (1928): Berlin, Germany
  • 34607726 (1922?) with the title Freemen of Shanghai: New York, NY

--Marc Kupper|talk 23:38, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I found the book on Google Books at vfwOAAAAQAAJ. It turns out this book is about Mr. and Mrs. Albert Freeman. I don't know if Google includes 100% of the words in its index but at least in the parts I could search the book does not mention mason, masonry, freemason, nor freemasonry. --Marc Kupper|talk 02:04, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

1927 conviction?[edit]

These articles are about a May 26, 1897 conviction of Booth-Tucker in the Court of General Sessions for "Keeping a disorderly house."

--Marc Kupper|talk 03:28, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Frederick Booth-Tucker. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:32, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Work amongs criminal tribes[edit]

The criminal tribes are only mentioned in a single sentence. I think it is an important point and also discussed in scholarshipt due to the question of missionary involvement with the ICS. The indian salvation army started in oppossition to and oppressed by the colonial officials in 1882 and started collaborating wiht them in 1908. I would like to add something about the cirminal tribes work to this article, using this literature:

  • Eason, Andrew: Religion in an Age of Empire: The Salvation Army and British Imperialism, 1878 – 1914, in: Journal of Religious History 45/1 (2021), S. 91 – 111.
  • Eason, Andrew: Religion vs the Raj: The Salvation Army’s “Invasion” of British India, in: Mission Studies 28 (2011), S. 71 – 90.
  • Fischer-Tiné: Reclaiming Savages in ‘Darkest England’ and ‘Darkest India’: the Salvation Army as Transnational Agent of the Civilizing Mission, in: Civilizing Missions in Colonial and Postcolonial South Asia. From Improvement to Development, ed. by Carey Watt und Michael Mann, London 2011.
  • Radhakrishna, Meena: Dishonoured by History. ‘Criminal Tribes’ and British Colonial Policy, Hyderabad 2001.
  • Radhakrishna, Meena: Missionaries and myth making: Salvation Army and Itinerant Communities in Madras Presidency, Neu Delhi 1997.

Cyndalorsa (talk) 10:35, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]