Talk:Fred C. Aiken House
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Caption[edit]
Beyond My Ken, I was actually trying to remove the caption from the photo when you click on it. I do NOT want to promote my travel guide as you stated, but it appears on the link, even if I edited the wikimedia. If you know how to do it, please do, otherwise remove the picture and revert to the previous one, even if it was not so clear as mine. --Elisa.rolle (talk) 21:58, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
- Sorry, that's not how it works - you do not have control over how your images get used once you upload it, so I will alooow the best image to remain in the infobox, whether it's yours or not. I'll check into the mention of your travel guide, as I'm not sure exactly what you're referring to. Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:07, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
- Beyond My Ken, it was probably a refresh issue, now that I changed the wikimedia, the caption is the right one. The source of the image is my own work, copyrighted at the Library of Congress, but once I move it to Source, instead of Description, the Caption is right. --Elisa.rolle (talk) 22:14, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
- I've replaced that image with what I believe to be the best image of the house available on Commons. If you wish to remove mention of your travel guide on the image's page on Commons, simply edit it and replace the "Source" entry with "{{own}}" which will mark the image as your own work.Incidentally, the current state of American copyright does not require that the work be registered, or that a copy of it be sent to the Library of Congress. All copyrightable material is automatically copyrighted at the time it is published, whether or not it has a copyright notice on it. Your ownership and copyright of your images remains intact, but by uploading them to Commons, you have licensed them under the CC-BY-SA license, which allows re-use of the image under specific circumstances, without your prior permission (as long as the terms of the license are upheld). Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:26, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
- Beyond My Ken, I believe this is the best approach, even if, sorry I do not agree the other picture is better, half part of the house, especially the windows that are an essential part of the Addison Mizner's design, are missing. But, as I said, I want to maintain the right source in Wikimedia, therefore I prefer the picture on Wikipedia is the other one. I do not know why in this case it appears like that, in all other picture I uploaded, the Description and/or Source in Wikimedia does not appear, BUT if you use the picture on the main info body, it does. --Elisa.rolle (talk) 22:31, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
- If someone other than you or I thinks that one of the other images on Commons -- including yours -- is better than this current one, I have no objection to their replacing it, but as far as my own visual judgment goes, this is the best. As for the other problem, I have to admit that I really am not understanding what you're saying. Are you talking about what comes up when you rollover the image? If so, I have that feature turned off. Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:42, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
- BMK, I agree. Thanks for the adjustments. The ones I took of the house weren't as good as I wanted since the weather was not great that day. I have taken literally thousands of pictures around Florida, and I don't mind when mine are replaced if they are better. Mind you, it can be an incentive to go back and get an even better picture. :) Anyway, thanks for your help. Cheers! --‖ Ebyabe talk - Inspector General ‖ 23:33, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
- Btw, I fixed the category name on Commons and here. I've done that occasionally myself, so no big. Thanks! --‖ Ebyabe talk - Union of Opposites ‖ 23:34, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
- If someone other than you or I thinks that one of the other images on Commons -- including yours -- is better than this current one, I have no objection to their replacing it, but as far as my own visual judgment goes, this is the best. As for the other problem, I have to admit that I really am not understanding what you're saying. Are you talking about what comes up when you rollover the image? If so, I have that feature turned off. Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:42, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
- Beyond My Ken, I believe this is the best approach, even if, sorry I do not agree the other picture is better, half part of the house, especially the windows that are an essential part of the Addison Mizner's design, are missing. But, as I said, I want to maintain the right source in Wikimedia, therefore I prefer the picture on Wikipedia is the other one. I do not know why in this case it appears like that, in all other picture I uploaded, the Description and/or Source in Wikimedia does not appear, BUT if you use the picture on the main info body, it does. --Elisa.rolle (talk) 22:31, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
- I've replaced that image with what I believe to be the best image of the house available on Commons. If you wish to remove mention of your travel guide on the image's page on Commons, simply edit it and replace the "Source" entry with "{{own}}" which will mark the image as your own work.Incidentally, the current state of American copyright does not require that the work be registered, or that a copy of it be sent to the Library of Congress. All copyrightable material is automatically copyrighted at the time it is published, whether or not it has a copyright notice on it. Your ownership and copyright of your images remains intact, but by uploading them to Commons, you have licensed them under the CC-BY-SA license, which allows re-use of the image under specific circumstances, without your prior permission (as long as the terms of the license are upheld). Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:26, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
- Beyond My Ken, it was probably a refresh issue, now that I changed the wikimedia, the caption is the right one. The source of the image is my own work, copyrighted at the Library of Congress, but once I move it to Source, instead of Description, the Caption is right. --Elisa.rolle (talk) 22:14, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Fred C. Aiken House. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070310140242/http://www.flheritage.com/facts/reports/places/index.cfm?fuseaction=ListAreas&county=palm%20beach to http://www.flheritage.com/facts/reports/places/index.cfm?fuseaction=ListAreas&county=palm%20beach
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:58, 7 October 2017 (UTC)