Talk:Frankenstein: The True Story

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.

Horror Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Title[edit]

The title should be explained. Tim Long 03:53, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Plot summary[edit]

The removal of 7810 bytes from the plot summary earlier today did make it shorter, but did not accomplish the contributor's stated goal of making it less confusing. Without the deleted paragraphs, and with no further editing of the remaining content, the plot summary makes no sense whatsoever. The deleted portion should be restored until someone is able to take the time to edit this section into a concise but coherent summary. Dgatkapvl (talk) 02:30, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I see that someone has not only addressed my initial concern, but also seems to have embarked on a continuing effort to improve the quality of this article. Thanks, Lc4963! (I would love to help, but it's been so long since i've seen the movie that i don't trust my memory as concerns details of the plot; plus, you're doing such a great job, i'd hate to be working at cross-purposes with you. Dgatkapvl (talk) 06:29, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like this issue has been sitting here for a while. I've taken another pass at shortening it. I have it down from roughly 1525 to about 1075. It still needs to lose another 400 words or so. As I'm not familiar with the film, I'm reluctant to do much more, lest I lose something meaningful.

I can't imagine investing the time to watch this. If anyone has seen it and wants to take a crack, please have at it. - SummerPhD^v2.0 22:38, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]