Talk:Frank Lapidus/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 21:38, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Starting review. Pyrotec (talk) 21:38, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Intial review[edit]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

A reasonably comprehensive review of the fictional character "Frank Lapidus".

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:
So called references 2 to 10 are links to wikipedia articles.

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
So called references 2 to 10 are links to wikipedia articles.

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

The use of wikipedia articles are not acceptable as "reliable sources". These references will need to be replaced with WP:RS. Pyrotec (talk) 22:09, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2 to 10 are referencing episodes of the series. –thedemonhog talk • edits 01:02, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that contribution. On that basis I will accept them. Pyrotec (talk) 08:46, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations on the quality of the article, I'm awarding it GA-status. Pyrotec (talk) 14:28, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]