Talk:Frank J. Sprague

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sprague and Edison[edit]

The statement 'One of Sprague's significant contributions to the Edison Laboratory at Menlo Park, New Jersey, was the introduction of mathematical methods. Prior to his arrival, Edison conducted many costly trial-and-error experiments. Sprague's approach was to calculate using mathematics the optimum parameters and thus save much needless tinkering.' is both unsourced and incorrect.

Edison was already using mathematical methods when Sprague joined him, for example, employing physicist and mathematician Francis Robbins Upton in 1879. It also repeats and widely believed and unsourced myth about Edison's use of trial and error and so fails to recognise its significance to Edison's sucsess as an inventor. See

Wills, Ian. "The Edisonian Method: Trial and Error." Chap. 10 In Thomas Edison : Success and Innovation through Failure, 203-22: Springer, 2019.

I have deleted the erroneous statement. Sovsw (talk) 05:39, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled[edit]

Look at:

Rowsome, Frank; Stephan McGuire, tech. ed. (1956). A Trolley Car Treasury: A Century of American Streetcars—Horsecars, Cable Cars, Interurbans, and Trolleys. New York: McGraw.

For a whole chapter on Sprague. It's hard to find and long out of print, but I found several copies on Amazon. It's defiantely worth a read, and adds soome human anecdotes this article could use. Andacar (talk)

How was constant speed electric motor achieved[edit]

It says "His motor was the first to maintain constant speed under varying load" but neither here or at electric motor does it say how this was achieved ie what technique or invention required. - Rod57 (talk) 11:58, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's a shunt motor, which is described at the bottom of DC motor. astrayelmgod (talk) 31 January 2017 —Preceding undated comment added 06:45, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

shaded by Edison?[edit]

As one of seemingly a number of creative inventors perhaps unfairly overshadowed by Edison, in the legacy of popular history, let's try to improve this article! Maybe the article should be more pointed about how Edison bought out his motor company, and took his name off the motors he invented, somewhat erasing him from history?-71.174.175.150 (talk) 02:08, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

motor invention details[edit]

Sprague invented important motor tech. The article should include at least one good drawing of key details of his motor tech. And at least a brief description of the tech, with links to other articles that ought to explain such tech details more completely. Trying to find such WP content today, the other relevant tech articles seem to mostly not even mention his name, and are very vague at best about the relevant science and tech.

It seems like he would have had quite a few patents, and that this aspect should be included in the article.-71.174.175.150 (talk) 15:55, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Frank J. Sprague. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:20, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]