Talk:Francis X. DiLorenzo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Phrases like "headlines shocked Hawaii residents" do not reflect well on the article which is far too detailed as well. Rmhermen 19:21, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There is no citation for DiLorenzo's comments on the Sexual Minorities Commission. ~~ Mike 1981

Criticism section[edit]

The article is too vague in the criticism section. All it says is that two priests disagreed with the Bishop, but it doesn't give much in examples. Why did Father Mamo disagree with Bishop DiLorenzo? What exactly did Bishop DiLorenzo do or not do? J.J. Bustamante 04:41, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Resignation of three women Pastoral Coordinators[edit]

Why was this section incorporated? It has nothing to do with the subject of the article. Did they resign because of something the bishop said or did? If nothing more specific is added in a few days, I'll remove the section. Blockhouse (talk) 17:22, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vague[edit]

This article is vague, and lacking in inline citations. --DThomsen8 (talk) 12:23, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality[edit]

Several sections of this article potentially violate Wikipedia's policy on neutrality. Most in need of review are sections: Bishop of Honolulu-Opposition to Homosexuality, and Bishop of Richmond-Controversies-Father Thomas J. Quinlan. --dnclark 17:02, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Francis X. DiLorenzo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:27, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]