Talk:Forrest Gump/GA1

GA Review[edit]

I nominated the article at GAN after expanding the article. If you have not significantly contributed to the article, consider reviewing it at WP:GAN. Good job to everyone that has contributed to the article in the past and hopefully it passes. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 02:10, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA pass: GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

The article looks great, great work to all who were involved! Nicely sourced, written and great info! Wildroot (talk) 04:33, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And it passed, good job everyone. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:54, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Article Title[edit]

Why is this article at Forrest Gump? Since the book came first, shouldn't this be Forrest Gump (film)? Emperor001 (talk) 04:48, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]