Talk:Form and content

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 January 2019 and 25 April 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): SilverSaturn15739.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:41, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Class assignment[edit]

As a rhetorician, a writer, and a visual artist, I have repeatedly wondered about the form/content distinction. When preparing to team teach an Honors Seminar course called "Politics and Literary Form," my colleague and I decided to ask the students in the class to fill the then (as of July 29, 2009) empty "Form and content" page with a substantial and well-wrought encyclopedia article on this fascinating topic. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcgeet (talk • contribs) (12:42, 29 July 2009)

With all due respect, Wikipedia is not the place for you to make class assignments. The majority of content that has been added during your little experiment has been unreferenced, essay-like, OR, and not at all in keeping with WP's standards. ---RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 03:31, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@RepublicanJacobite 120.21.106.126 (talk) 20:53, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is truly one of the most uninformative articles that I have read.The words do not designate understandable, intelligible concepts that are grounded on concrete perceptions.98.110.35.110 (talk) 03:54, 19 May 2013 (UTC)PaddyOMalley[reply]

thomas[edit]

is English for dydimus or twin (also any person who is bright and intelligent 38.128.98.81 (talk) 21:18, 20 September 2017 (UTC)T38.128.98.81 (talk) 21:18, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]