Talk:Flower (video game)/Archive 1

Fair use rationale for Image:Flower rose01.jpg

Image:Flower rose01.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 18:41, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Flower title.jpg

Image:Flower title.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 18:41, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Flower rose01.jpg

Image:Flower rose01.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 18:41, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Flower rose01.jpg

Image:Flower rose01.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 18:41, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Flower rose01.jpg

Image:Flower rose01.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 18:41, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Noting down for sourcing of dev section

[1]

Will try to add later, anyone else is free to incorporate. -MASEM (t) 15:22, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Name

The game is called "Flowery" in Japan. Not sure how that can be fit into the full article... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.237.215.113 (talk) 08:42, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

As it was developed in the US (it looks like anyway), we only show the English name. ♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫ (talk) 14:41, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Correct, thatgamecompany is based in California. There is no Japanese connection to the game. --PresN 19:23, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Distributor

Note from Template:Infobox video game:

distributor - The popular name(s) of the game's distributor(s). Only use this field if it is a different company from the publisher. The name(s) can be wikilinked.

According to that, mentioning "Sony Computer Entertainment" twice in the infobox is unnecessary? Not a big deal but... 91.156.53.248 (talk) 19:16, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Yes, it is unnecessary according to the template documentation. Fixed. --PresN 21:18, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Developers

I think Jenova Chen was creative director, not lead designer (Nicholas Clark).[2][3] 91.156.53.248 (talk) 15:09, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Yes and no. You're right that Clark is listed as the lead designer, and I'll fix that in the article, but Chen was the one who determined the direction of the game and what it would be about, which is traditionally the role of the lead designer, no matter what title they use. That said, given that even the composer had a hand in level design, I don't think the 7-9 person company was terribly worried about the boundaries between job roles, so It's probably best to note that both Chen and Clark were in charge of designing the game as a whole. --PresN 19:22, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Ok. Btw, I'm a bit confused, because one source says that developer team was 6-9 big, but their home website introduces 13. 91.156.53.248 (talk) 20:35, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

That's odd. Only thing I can think of is that it was 12 people total, but only 6-9 at any one time. --PresN 21:47, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, and Santiago said in this interview, that it was actually 7-10. 91.156.53.248 (talk) 22:33, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

So what you're saying is they aren't allowed to hire 3 people in 3 years after publishing a successful game? :D 13 now doesn't mean they had 13 then. Rifter0x0000 (talk) 08:40, 27 November 2010 (UTC)