Talk:Flicky

Removal of UNSOURCED tag

I have removed the unsourced tag. If you think an article lacks sources, please state the sources it lacks on the discussion page. This is a video game article, and therefore most of its content will probably have been derived by simply playing the video game. Kidburla2002 23:02, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Flicky/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Freikorp (talk · contribs) 10:15, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   I'd wikilink Amusement arcade into the first sentence of the lead

   Done

   I'd specify what Chirps are in the lead

   Done

   Is it accurate to say "With only the ability to run side-to-side and jump" when the character can pick something up and throw it? Should this be reworded accordingly?

   Items are picked up automatically by running into them, and thrown automatically when you jump. I reworded it so they are not the only abilities Flicky has.

   There's a collection of several titles (Sonic Mega Collection, Sega Genesis Collection etc) though no indication of when these were released. Perhaps add the year of release in brackets after each title? Or give an indication in the sentence, as in "Through the 2000s, ..."

   Added dates

   "also pointed out the games cuteness and concluded that the game was aimed for children and provided lower scores" - this reads awkwardly and should be reworded. Also did they give it a lower score specifically because it was aimed at children? This is unclear.

   Yes they thought it was a lame young kids game and thus provided lower scores. I reworded, feel free to CE.

   I'd wikilink cheat code

   Done

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail: Well done. Looking forward to passing this once minor issues are addressed. Freikorp (talk) 10:31, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

   @Freikorp: Responded.

   Happy for this to pass now. Congratulations. Freikorp (talk) 23:03, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Spacing

"Bluebird" is one word, unless you simply mean "a bird that is blue" Booger-mike (talk) 19:58, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

The spacing is intentional. TarkusAB^talk 00:22, 22 May 2019 (UTC)