Talk:Flash ADC

Electronics Low‑importance

	Electronics portal This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Folding circuit[edit]

The article's name is Flash converter.

A folding ADC is to my opinion a flash ADC with some analog preprocessing in front to re-use the same comparator bank. So should I make a seperate page of a folding ADC or add it as a paragraph in the flash ADC section? Any suggestions? —Preceding unsigned comment added by ChardonnayNimeque (talk • contribs) 20:20, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The latter was the right thing to do; perhaps you would like to explain in a more elementary way what a folding circuit does. Jim.henderson 04:52, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

While historically folding ADCs have been called "Flash Folding" they don't really have that much in common with a flash, but more with subranging structures. I think a new page for the structure would be best. I guess that means I should get to work... Guerberj (talk) 04:15, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I would say it depends on whether someone wants to explain folding in enough detail so it can be understood. Overjive (talk) 19:02, 30 May 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Overjive (talk • contribs)

bits[edit]

How many bits can you get today? It would seem with the large IC now, they could get to 10 or 12 bits. Gah4 (talk) 18:36, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Number of comparators for a flash ADC[edit]

The article reads:

"(...) a flash converter requires 2^n - 1 comparators for an n-bit conversion." However, in the image showing the implementation of a 2-bit flash ADC (n = 2), there are 4 instead of 3 comparators. I propose the excerpt above is made more clear: "(...) a flash converter requires 2^n - 1 comparators for an n-bit conversion, though more comparators can be present." Qwertesque (talk) 20:37, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article says requires. I suspect in the actual case, many test for overflow and underflow, so 2^n or 2^n+1. Not required, but nice! Gah4 (talk) 07:39, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]