Talk:Fireman's Fund Insurance Company

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Unttled[edit]

Not disputing the factual accuracy here, but this article does seem a bit like cheerleading. A google search of "fireman's fund controversy" yeilds 90K+ articles, certianly there's more to the story. Cleanup requested as this is basically a bullet point list of things the company has done rather than a written history. --Xyrrus 02:02, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How does it looks now? I'm still working on it... for a company with 140 years of history and 4,000 employees it didn't have a very good article. --W.marsh 02:30, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Xyrrus - Not sure what google search was done to yield 90k+ hits on the search term used. Certainly, the word "controversy" is a legal term that is commonly used to define a court case, which insurance companies are always involved in. I do agree that there are other aspects of FF history that should be in the article. Jaywhip 13:50, 10 November 2007 (UTC) Jaywhip[reply]

Lots of Changes[edit]

There have been many changes since the last posting. FFIC's profitable divisions are either being sold off or being included into owner Allianz's own portfolio. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nadalotta (talkcontribs) 03:49, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]