Talk:Finjan Holdings

Computer Security: Computing Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer Security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer SecurityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer SecurityTemplate:WikiProject Computer SecurityComputer Security articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with:

Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...

Answer question about Same-origin_policy
Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links are broken, lack of citations everywhere. Only notable thing about this company is their patent trolling, which isn't mentioned. Not notable, should be deleted.

This page sounds like an advertisment... "Finjan's unmatched technlogy"... requires a substantial re-write or elimination. 59.183.156.48 (talk) 10:22, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

They are pretty big name behind the stage. A lot of antivirus software vendors and security appliance makers licence their tech and sell it under their own name or implement them as a module in their own system. Certainly notable company in IT-security. 82.131.210.162 11:44, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I searched Yahoo! and found 571,000 results. Sounds notable. MalwareSmarts 20:40, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I searched Google and found 333,000 results. My analysis confirms that Finjan is not notable, and the article should be eliminated. This also lacks citations. --198.22.236.230 (talk) 20:54, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Finjan saved my life. --198.22.236.230 (talk) 21:05, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

About being unmatched - although it sounds like a commercial script, note that if that was the case what should really written? Check out the issue of the patent jury decision, which seems to put it in an unmatched position currently. As for being a big or small name, does it really matter? Is Wikipedia biased to size or magnitude of an entry? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.203.92.238 (talk) 14:50, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The club in Montréal or the coffee pot are more notable? 131.111.184.102 (talk) 13:13, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Finjan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:02, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]