Talk:Final Fight 2
 | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
Merge Proposal[edit]
"It has been suggested that this article or section be merged into Final Fight 2."
Hmm I say no.--84.66.55.170 (talk) 13:14, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
Confused casual reviews[edit]
Final Fight 2 was met with a mixed critical reception. Associated Press's William Schiffmann noted Final Fight 2 did not have the amount of moves in Capcom's fighting game Street Fighter II, but the addition of a two-player mode was seen as an improvement over the SNES version of the original Final Fight. Schiffmann opined the music was average, but complimented the graphics, in particular the backgrounds.[1] A review by Matt Williamson of The Rocky Mountain News was far more negative, calling the game "representative of only the worst properties in a fighting game [sic]" and criticizing it for having "bleak locales, uninteresting characters, unchallenging gameplay" and adhering to the "walk to the right, tap the buttons" formula.[2]
--Niemti (talk) 05:16, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Final Fight 2. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140502231234/http://www.gamesradar.com/best-snes-games-all-time/ to http://www.gamesradar.com/best-snes-games-all-time/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:50, 20 July 2016 (UTC)