Talk:Filoboletus manipularis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Article Evaluation - Opinion[edit]

Strengths: the article has relevant, up-to-date, and reliable sources. It also has relevant images of the fungi that supplement the written information. The written information is grammatically accurate, concise, and up-to-date. It also included synonym names for the fungi. Furthermore, the article is written with a neutral and does not have an overtly biased tone. Finally, the links in the article's citations do work and lead to reliable sources.:- Weaknesses: The article technically has good organization, however, there is very little information about the fungi on the page. So, it has little room for further organization of the information. Furthermore, the sources cited are not very thorough. They do cover the basics of the fungi, however, there is more available literature on the fungi that is not discussed in the article. Overall, the article has the basic information but is largely underdeveloped.Suggestions for Improvement: Expansion on all facets of information relating to the fungi, with the exception of scientific classification, naming, and synonyms associated with the fungi. Astrahiraeth (talk) 19:08, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Organismal Diversity[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 6 September 2023 and 15 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Astrahiraeth (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Buginarug11.

— Assignment last updated by Buginarug11 (talk) 17:29, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]