Talk:Fiat JTD engine

@Chieah Do you have references for your edits? I dont believe that to be true! Cheers :) 17:07, 11 September 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tanis8472 (talk • contribs)

It is requested that a photograph of the uniJet Turbo Diesel engine be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

It is requested that a diagram or diagrams of a combustion engine be included in this article to improve its quality. Specific illustrations, plots or diagrams can be requested at the Graphic Lab.
For more information, refer to discussion on this page and/or the listing at Wikipedia:Requested images.

Its just the traditional JTD that GM now own, and not the MultiJet common-rail, right? --Kiand 21:12, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

My reading of the press reports suggests that GM now owns the rights to all post-JV (1999+) technology as well as to the base engine. So this would include the modern JTD. I'm not sure if Fiat still retains any rights - reports have been contradictory. I would imagine that they retain pre-JV rights, and probably also get the JV-related work. --SFoskett 21:24, Jun 13, 2005 (UTC)

How did GM get all of these rights? Failed merger doesn't really explain it...

They didn't. Not according to this press-release from GM Europe, which states both companies retain shared intelectual property of the 1.9 L engine technology and the factory where the 1.3 L engine is built. I interpret this to mean they share property on the injection system. The 1.9 L block belongs to Fiat, as it predates its use of direct injection. The 1.3 L engine block may belong solely to Powertrain. I don't know about the forthcoming 1.6 L. --Pc13 07:53, 2005 Jun 14 (UTC)

I have a new MultiJet Panda, and I'd not have bought it if I knew GM had engine rights, I have my reasons for seriously disliking them... --Kiand 21:25, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Oh dear! How do you justify not liking GM. Can you tell us/me?

I used to dislike FIAT. In my opinion at the time i had good reason to dislike them. I had purchased two brand new cars from them. I now think it a complete waste of time to dislike any motor company based on one persons experience. They all provide a means to an end and are in a lot of cases very likeable.

All hp values are actually for PS. --Pc13 13:42, 2005 Jun 23 (UTC)

Copyvio?[edit]

http://www.carpages.co.uk/alfa_romeo/alfa_romeo_diesels_in_the_uk_part_2_26_03_03.asp --— Typ932^{T | C} 16:55, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

gostaria de saber se o motor 2,3 127cv emite mais poluentes —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.138.36.55 (talk) 01:14, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There's also a version of the 1st-generation 1.3 Multijet with 85PS (62kW) that uses a variable-geometry turbocharger - I have one in my Fiat Doblo and was wondering whether it has been used elsewhere. OK to add? Nkh08 (talk) 13:05, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on JTD engine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120325223100/http://www.gmpowertrain.com/EuropeVehicleEngines/IntroductionEurope.aspx to http://gmpowertrain.com/EuropeVehicleEngines/IntroductionEurope.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:26, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Suzuki 0.8L DDiS[edit]

The 0.8L DDiS is not a Multijet variant, it was developed solely by Suzuki, it uses an all aluminum construction. Siddhesh2205 (talk) 05:15, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]