Talk:Fargo City Detention Hospital

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: North Dakota Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	North Dakota portal This article is supported by WikiProject North Dakota (assessed as Low-importance).

Hospitals Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hospitals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hospitals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HospitalsWikipedia:WikiProject HospitalsTemplate:WikiProject HospitalsHospital articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

development[edit]

This article was just now started in a semi-automated way, and could use more attention, perhaps including use of sources that might be found online. Please help develop using sources in the article already, and please try Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL. --doncram (talk) 14:52, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article includes 2 good sources. It includes one good four sentence quote which explains context well. An editor who follows my edits and disagrees with me frequently has removed the quote and I restored it. The other editor has confused plagiarism and copyright issues before, and I do not accept his judgment that the quote is inappropriate. It is fully credited, so plagiarism cannot be asserted to be an issue. It is four sentences, still a short enough quote to qualify under fair use, copyright-wise. I think it is fine and good to use the good writing in the quote, with credit to its authors. --do ncr am 14:09, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's also longer than the rest of the article put together -- that's too much. Don't use a straight quote from the source if there's no historic reason to see the exact wording. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 14:18, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]