This redirect was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Rocketry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rocketry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RocketryWikipedia:WikiProject RocketryTemplate:WikiProject RocketryRocketry articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
@Appable: I have undone your changes because it's clearer to say this is a first-stage booster than just a first stage (or worse, a first-stage first stage). Please note the definition of rocket booster per Wikipedia is A booster rocket (or engine) is either the first stage of a multistage launch vehicle, or else a shorter-burning rocket used in parallel… So "booster" is absolutely a correct word to use, and we give context by saying it's a first-stage booster. Hope you will agree. — JFGtalk 03:36, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
What is known about the state after first and second recoveries, and the extent of refurbishment ? eg what parts got replaced ? turbopumps ? engines ? - Rod57 (talk) 18:14, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I have proposed a move to another booster from spacex too, I think we should call it Falcon 9 core B1021 because Ive heard spacex refer to them as cores — Preceding unsigned comment added by YuriGagrin12 (talk • contribs) 19:26, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
SpaceX does not necessarily decide the encyclopedic name, even if "core" were an official name (which does not seem to be the case). See the article title policy for details, and open a move request if you can show that most sources call it a "core". Will revert to the previous title until a discussion shows consensus to move. Same reasoning for other boosters in this series. — JFGtalk 03:29, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg){kind=small}
