Talk:Faeria

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Good article nominations

Squirtle (nom)
Slowpoke (Pokémon) (start)
Rayman (video game) (nom)
Setzer Gabbiani (start)
Game Boy Color (start)
Harold Halibut (nom)
Talim (Soulcalibur) (start)
Fusajiro Yamauchi (start)
Mr. Mime (start)
Bella Goth (nom)
Game Boy (nom)
Sonic Triple Trouble 16-Bit (nom)
Klefki (nom)
Sobble (start)
Exdeath (start)
Lucky Luna (nom)
Age of Empires: The Rise of Rome (start)
Mega Man X6 (nom)
38 Studios (start)
Pikachu (nom)
Reigns (video game) (start)
Fallout Online (start)
Donkey Kong (start)
Horizon Forbidden West (start)
Surround (video game) (start)
AirCars (start)
Laura Matsuda (start)
The Completionist (start)

DYK nominations

Reviews and reassessments

The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask (nom)
Hogwarts Legacy (rev)
Pokémon Channel (nom)
Rain World (rev)
Noctule (band) (rev)
Mario Kart: Double Dash (nom)

Articles that need...

Another MTG copy cat[edit]

How about improving the article? Has Hasbro owners of Wizards or Garfield MTG Patent holder taken any legal action as the game has several components that are detailed int he patent. Shouldnt it be noted in the article where it gets comes from, how its a copy of previous games? Masem its great how you destroy this discussion on improving the topic, Why Did you do that Masem? --TobyWongly (talk) 02:37, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You need sources to make this claim, and I have never heard of any action that has been taken against this game to that regard. Without any sources, there's nothing to discuss. --MASEM (t) 02:43, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Im just making suggestion of how to improve the article! Your personal incredulity is fabulous, but it does contain several things that are covered in the MTG Patent! Hence the question.— Preceding unsigned comment added by TobyWongly (talk • contribs)

You've cited no professionally-published mainstream academic or journalistic sources to support your claims -- which is your responsibility. Therefore, your claims are just your opinion, which we don't care about. Ian.thomson (talk) 04:04, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also, we do avoid trying to make any legal claims we have no authority over; trying to ask us to include this might be seen as making a legal threat (might being the key word) which can be a blockable offense. If there are legitimate legal issues over MTG's patents on this game, we need sources. (Be aware, in the US gameplay itself can't be copyrighted, see Video game clone for info on that, though I know if the patent's involved, that could be something different, but again, we are not supposed to act as legal experts.) --MASEM (t) 04:13, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I've blocked OP as a troll. Ian.thomson (talk) 04:17, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]