Talk:FIU Panthers football

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Too much editorializing[edit]

I tagged the article for POV as there seems to be too much editorializing in the prose. It is best to stick to the facts and not say whether it is "good" or "bad". 147.70.242.40 (talk) 17:46, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This article is the biggest piece of crap I ever read. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.129.183.150 (talk) 20:18, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This article needs *a lot* of work by someone more knowledgeable on the subject than I. It reads like a bad 5th grade paper. I could correct the grammar and prose, remove all the POV, but there's no point, it needs a complete rewrite. 71.59.213.116 (talk)

This article is pretty much awful. It appears that the original author tried to come across as highbrow and intellectual in his description of FIU Football, but the result is awkwardly worded, plagued by misspellings and incorrect word choices, and less than NPOV. I agree with above the a complete rewrite is needed. 161.154.235.101 (talk) 14:45, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:FIUGoldenPanthers.png[edit]

The image Image:FIUGoldenPanthers.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

The following images also have this problem:

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --01:54, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV dispute and unverified claims[edit]

The Division I-A section of the article sounds like a personal commentary more than a researched description of what Division I-A was like for FIU. It needs to verify all its claims, lose the comments, and be cleaned up massively. Digx (talk) 21:32, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]


There is only one footnote in the whole article and that is on the last two sentences. Other than that the entire article is not sourced and is full of opinions and personal observations. If this article is to remain published under wikipedia, it needs to be changed completely. Without being properly sourced, who knows what is a fact, what is an opinion or what information is plain wrong. I'm sure there are plenty of facts but they aren't sourced. Most of the article reads like it was written for a newspaper column by a local journalist. Comments like this; "Strock had been a mediocre coach and obviously wasn’t up to the challenge of forming a strong team" is nothing but personal observation and opinion. I'm not challenging whether its true or not, finding a source for that comment would be very difficult. This is not a venue for personal opinions.--Jatblue (talk) 16:13, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:FIU Golden Panthers which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 14:30, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:FIU Golden Panthers - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 19:46, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Florida International Golden Panthers - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 20:01, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on FIU Panthers football. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:18, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Starting quarterbacks[edit]

The navigational box listing the starting quarterbacks will most likely be deleted soon. In the event any of the quarterbacks are notable and more articles can be written, or if someone wants the list as it stands right now, here it is:

Frietjes (talk) 15:32, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]