Talk:Ex turpi causa non oritur actio

Law Mid‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Latin Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Latin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LatinWikipedia:WikiProject LatinTemplate:WikiProject LatinLatin articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Ex injuria non oritur[edit]

Ian Lacey (ISBN 0 646 04964 X) say that this principle operates in international law "to the effect that no legal claim to territory can arise of an illegal aggression.

Ludvikus 06:55, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ex iniuria non oritur[edit]

Julius Stone use the above Latin phrase for effectively the same sense.

Ludvikus 06:55, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Professor Stephen Schwebel[edit]

This eminent judge of the International Court of Justice is a relevant authority on this subject.

Ludvikus 06:55, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

International law[edit]

Is this article not at all relevant to theLaw of nations?

User:Ludvikus|Ludvikus]] 06:59, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Tinsley v Milligan [1992][edit]

How many years did this case last? Is this date correct? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Moshe-paz (talk • contribs) 15:08, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In answer in part to your question, it was recently over-ruled...

Patel v Mirza - major reconsideration[edit]

It seems the court completely reconsiderd the whole doctrine from the ground up, providing a whole new set of principles. These changes were sufficiently important to have whole books written about this one decision - for example: https://www.bloomsburyprofessional.com/uk/illegality-after-patel-v-mirza-9781509912773/

--Accurate Nuanced Clear (talk) 08:59, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]