Talk:Evangelical Presbyterian Church in England and Wales

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sincerity of members?[edit]

I just removed this:

It has the Westminster Confession of Faith as a principle, but it is not really believed or implemented by the vast majority of its office bearers or members. Its Book of Church Order is not followed, unless the Presbytery or Session finds it in its own interests at any particular time to do so.

It is well written and a very interesting assertion -- I don't know much about this church. I would be interested to see a balanced presentation of how strictly presbyterian they might be, as part of the growth of the article. In any case, sources would be very useful, as they seem to claim a very strict Calvinism at their own website. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 21:59, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Evangelical Presbyterian Church in England and Wales. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:59, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]