Talk:Embraer R-99

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Military history: Aviation

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force

ERIEYE vs. EGIS[edit]

I reverted the edit replacing the ERIEYE radar for "Erieye Ground Interface Segment". I found no substantive reference to EGIS online, other than an acronym website. Ericsson's website also makes no reference to it, having its main page to the radar still calling it the "ERIEYE". My best guess EGIS is a sub-system of the ERIEYE system, linking airborne radar data to ground receivers.--Dali-Llama 19:32, 15 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:EMB R-99A.jpg[edit]

Image:EMB R-99A.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:50, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The image is from the E-99, the R-99 has an antenna on the belly-side of the fuselage. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.82.155.131 (talk) 16:03, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mexican units[edit]

Embraer's web site indicates specificaly that they delivered one EMB 145 AEW&C and two EMB 145 MP to Mexico. Why do you quote different models?: [1] BatteryIncluded (talk) 13:50, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Air France Flight 447[edit]

The Brazilian Air Forced used a Embraer R-99A for SAR operations regarding the Air France Flight 447. Is this notable for Embraer R-99? --77.4.50.208 (talk) 09:33, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I would say not notable as they were just doing the job they were designed for. MilborneOne (talk) 09:40, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

E-99[edit]

This is mentioned on Operators section but is not on Variants. (??) --Jor70 (talk) 14:17, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think its an R-99B. Someone keeps adding that every once in a while, but I've seen no sources to back up its use. - BilCat (talk) 16:15, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Flight Attendant?[edit]

I assume this is incorrect, and the third crewman will be operating the on board radar? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.121.7.90 (talk) 13:11, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect that the reference to a flight attendant was carried over from the specs of the passenger versions. SV1XV (talk) 13:48, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Embraer R-99. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071030053423/http://www.embraercommercialjets.com/english/content/home_erj/ to http://www.embraercommercialjets.com/english/content/home_erj/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:47, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Embraer R-99. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:52, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

specs[edit]

Removed :- really do need a proper source, not just guessing

{aircraft specifications |plane or copter?=plane |jet or prop?=jet |ref=Suppositions according to EMB 145 family specifications.^{[citation needed]} |crew=pilot, co-pilot, 5–7 mission systems operators |capacity= |payload main= |payload alt= |length main= 28.45 m |length alt=93 ft 4 in |span main=20.04 m |span alt=65 ft 9 in |height main=6.76 m |height alt=22 ft 2 in |area main= 51.2 m² |area alt= 551 ft² |airfoil= |empty weight main= 11,740 kg |empty weight alt= 25,900 lb |loaded weight main= 17,100 kg |loaded weight alt= 37,700 lb |useful load main= |useful load alt= |max takeoff weight main= 24,000 kg |max takeoff weight alt= 46,500 lb |more general= |engine (jet)=Rolls-Royce AE 3007A |type of jet=turbofan |number of jets=2 |thrust main= 33.0 kN |thrust alt= 7,420 lb_f |thrust original= |afterburning thrust main= |afterburning thrust alt= |max speed main=834+ km/h |max speed alt= 518+ mph, Mach 0.78+ |cruise speed main= |cruise speed alt= |stall speed main= |stall speed alt= |never exceed speed main= |never exceed speed alt= |range main= 3,019 km + internal tanks |range alt=1,876 miles + internal tanks |ceiling main= 11,278+ m |ceiling alt= 37,000+ ft |climb rate main=780+ m/min |climb rate alt= 2,560+ ft/min |loading main= 334+ kg/m² |loading alt=68+ lb/ft² |thrust/weight= |power/mass main= |power/mass alt= |more performance= |armament= |avionics= }}--Petebutt (talk) 11:20, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]