Talk:Elections Canada

Canada: Governments / Politics Mid‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Governments of Canada.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Political parties and politicians in Canada.

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

It is requested that a photograph of Elections Canada headquarters, 30 Victoria Street, Gatineau, Quebec K1A 0M6 be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in Ottawa may be able to help!

The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Just out of curiosity, how do we know he is the highest paid civil servant? HistoryBA 01:26, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious-seeming Raymond Samuels website[edit]

http://www.elections-canada.com

This site contains information about Samuels's career and has prominent pictures of Mr. Kingsley.[1] It could, in theory, confuse someone who doesn't know it's not official.

The reason why I mentioned it was to prevent such confusion from occurring (not to draw attention to the site itself). Do other contributors believe the reference should be returned? CJCurrie 22:14, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Photo ID requirement[edit]

The article does not reflect recent legislation on the requirement for photo ID. I want to start another section on this. I will do so barring any objections.Toddsschneider 11:17, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I object to the ridiculously long section that deals with news that will be irrelevant soon enough. It should either be massively edited or deleted wholesale. 99.247.22.44 (talk) 12:32, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it's definitely given undue weight, and isn't NPOV.

As well, the references are badly-formatted. — Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 01:11, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely too long Basser g (talk) 22:42, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

2011, the Year of the elections[edit]

I'm not certain, but this year has gotta be a record, in terms of the number of provincial elections & now the federal election occuring. GoodDay (talk) 18:19, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My point is, should we mention this in this article? if sources are provided. GoodDay (talk) 15:01, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure it's appropriate for an article on Elections Canada. Me-123567-Me (talk) 15:57, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Elections Canada. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070421084430/http://www.elections.ca:80/home.asp? to http://www.elections.ca/home.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:54, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]